In proceeding 31102, the Consumers’ Coalition of Alberta (CCA) applied to the Alberta Utilities Commission (the Commission or AUC) for reconsideration of its decision to deny the CCA standing in Proceeding 30955.
To view more of this post, please
In proceeding 31102, the Consumers’ Coalition of Alberta (CCA) applied to the Alberta Utilities Commission (the Commission or AUC) for reconsideration of its decision to deny the CCA standing in Proceeding 30955.
The Alberta Utilities Commission (AUC or Commission) approved a Negotiated Settlement Agreement (NSA) in Proceeding 30504 between FortisAlberta Inc. (Fortis) and the intervenors on Fortis’s depreciation study. The Commission considered whether the negotiated adjustments to Fortis’s depreciation parameters and the resulting impacts on revenue requirements and customer rates should be approved.
The Alberta Utilities Commission (the AUC or Commission) has issued Decision 30745-D01-2026 on EPCOR Distribution & Transmission Inc. (EPCOR) compliance filing to their Phase 2 application. As part of this compliance filing, the Commission also considered whether to approve EPCOR’s updated cost-of-service study, rate design model, Terms and Conditions, tariff policies, and investment eligibility.
The Alberta Utilities Commission (AUC or Commission) issued its decision on the appropriate administrative penalties and operational remedies arising from the contraventions established against AltaLink Management Ltd. (AltaLink).
In Proceeding 30555, the Alberta Utilities Commission (AUC or Commission) issued its decision reconsidering the compensation payable by FortisAlberta Inc. (Fortis) to Battle River Power Coop (Battle River) for the transfer of 41 customer sites and related distribution facilities from Battle River to Fortis. The proceeding followed a direction from the Court of Appeal of Alberta that the compensation be determined under Section 29(4) of the Hydro and Electric Energy Act rather than Section 32.
In proceeding 29934, Direct Energy Regulated Services (Direct Energy) filed a complaint regarding ATCO Electric Ltd.’s (ATCO) interpretation and application of its customer and retailer Terms & Conditions (T&Cs), specifically with respect to permanent disconnections and the continued charging of idle service fees. The Alberta Utilities Commission (AUC or Commission) issued its decision following further application from Direct Energy to have the complaint withdrawn after Direct Energy and ATCO reached a resolution regarding the T&Cs.
In proceeding 30645, the Alberta Utilities Commission (Commission or AUC) delivered its decision regarding EPCOR Harmony Inc. (EPCOR’s) application requesting approval of its 2026-2027 revenue requirement, potable water rates, terms and conditions of service, and various fees and charges for miscellaneous services.
In proceeding 30323, the Alberta Utilities Commission (AUC or Commission) issued its final decision with respect to ATCO Electric Transmission (ATCO)’s 2026-2027 general tariff application (GTA) and its 2022-2024 deferral application.
In proceeding 30760, the Alberta Utilities Commission (AUC or Commission) released its decision on the preliminary question application by Langdon Waterworks Limited (Langdon) for review of Commission Decision 30165-D02-2026.
In proceeding 30323, ATCO Electric Transmission (ATCO) applied to the Alberta Utilities Commission (AUC) for approval of a negotiated settlement agreement (NSA) between itself, the Consumers’ Coalition of Alberta (CCA), the Office of the Utilities Consumer Advocate (UCA) and the Industrial Power Consumers Association of Alberta (IPCAA), in respect of ATCO’s 2026-2027 general tariff application (GTA).