AltaLink 2026-2027 GTA Decision

In Proceeding 29879, the Alberta Utilities Commission (AUC or Commission) issued its decision on four applications filed by AltaLink Management Ltd. on behalf of it and its affiliated entities: AltaLink Limited Partnership, PiikaniLink L.P., and KainaiLink L.P. (collectively referred to as AltaLink).[1]

Because the parties had already negotiated and submitted a settlement agreement, the Commission’s decision addressed only the matters that were not resolved within that agreement.



To view more of this post, please

Login Here

or contact us.

Court of Appeal Decision – REA Service Area Annexation

The Alberta Court of Appeal released its Memorandum of Judgment, 2025 ABCA 399, in the appeal by Battle River Power Coop (BRPC) of AUC Decision 28358-D01-2024. The appeal, brought against the Alberta Utilities Commission (AUC) and Fortis Alberta Inc. (Fortis), concerned the amount of compensation awarded to BRPC and the appropriate legislative provision applied following the transfer of a portion of BRPC’s service area and facilities to Fortis.



To view more of this post, please

Login Here

or contact us.

Decision on Water Rate Appeal by Mondi Hinton Inc. v. the Town of Hinton

In Proceeding 30205, The Alberta Utilities Commission (the Commission or AUC) issued its decision on the water rate Appeal by Mondi Hinton Inc. (Mondi) against the Town of Hinton (the Town).



To view more of this post, please

Login Here

or contact us.

EPCOR Harmony Water Utility Rate Application

In Proceeding 30249, the Alberta Utilities Commission (AUC or Commission) issued its decision on EPCOR Harmony Inc.’s (EPCOR) application for 2026-2027 water utility revenue requirements and rates.



To view more of this post, please

Login Here

or contact us.

ATCO General Tariff Application 2026-2027

In Proceeding 30323, ATCO Electric Transmission (AET or ATCO) filed its 2026–2027 General Tariff Application (GTA) and its 2022–2024 Deferral Application with the Alberta Utilities Commission (AUC or Commission). The Consumers’ Coalition of Alberta (CCA) and the Office of the Utilities Consumer Advocate (UCA) both registered as interveners within the proceeding.



To view more of this post, please

Login Here

or contact us.

AltaLink Enforcement Proceeding – Update

In proceeding 30074, AltaLink Management Ltd. (AltaLink) and the Alberta Utilities Commission Enforcement Staff (Enforcement Staff) file their final arguments and reply arguments with the Alberta Utilities Commission (AUC or Commission).



To view more of this post, please

Login Here

or contact us.

Town of Hinton Water Rates – Update

In proceeding 30205 Mondi Hinton Inc. (Mondi) and the Town of Hinton (the Town) file final arguments and reply arguments with the Alberta Utilities Commission (AUC or Commission) in their water rates dispute.  



To view more of this post, please

Login Here

or contact us.

Update on Water Dispute between CRN and JSB Water Commissions

In proceeding 29831, the John S. Batiuk Regional Water Commission (JSB) and the Capital Region Northeast Water Services Commission (CRN) filed their reply arguments regarding a dispute over water rates being charged by CRN to JSB. The Commission also issued its decision on the matter.



To view more of this post, please

Login Here

or contact us.

Decision on ATCO R&V Application on Phase II PBR Reopener

In proceeding 30141, the Alberta Utilities Commission (AUC or Commission) issued its decision on the application by ATCO Gas and Pipelines Ltd and ATCO Electric Ltd. (collectively ATCO) for a Review and Variance (R&V) of Decision 29064-D01-2025.



To view more of this post, please

Login Here

or contact us.

AltaLink Enforcement Proceeding

In proceeding 30074, the Alberta Utilities Commission Enforcement staff (Enforcement staff) filed an application with the Alberta Utilities Commission (AUC or Commission) regarding AltaLink Management Ltd., and the general partner of AltaLink L.P., a Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company (AltaLink’s) use of MacLean Power System (MPS) insulators on its transmission lines. Enforcement staff allege the MPS insulators violate utility laws due to improper usage.



To view more of this post, please

Login Here

or contact us.