To view more of this post, please
AESO Replies to Stakeholder Comments on the AESO’s 2022 Budget
The Alberta Electric System Operator (AESO) replied to stakeholder comments received in response to Session 2 of their 2022 Budget Review Process (BRP).
To view more of this post, please
Login Here
ENMAX’s COVID-19 Rate Adjustment Application Decision
In Proceeding 26505, ENMAX Energy Corporation (ENMAX) submitted an application to the Alberta Utilities Commission (the Commission) for a COVID-19 Rate Adjustment by way of a deferral account. The Commission has issued a ruling on the application.
To view more of this post, please
Login Here
Information Requests and Responses to EPCOR’s Non-Energy RRT Application
In Proceeding 26694, EPCOR Energy Alberta (EPCOR) responds to Information Requests (IR) from the Consumers Coalition of Alberta (CCA) and the Utilities Consumer Advocate (UCA) regarding its 2021-2022 Non-Energy Regulated Rate Tariff (RRT) Application (the Application) to the Alberta Utilities Commission (the Commission).
To view more of this post, please
Login Here
ATCO & Fortis 2023 Cost-of-Service Review
Proceeding 26615 follows ATCO Electric Ltd. (ATCO) and FortisAlberta Inc. (Fortis) in their 2023 cost-of-service (COS) applications. Of note is the new hybrid format being used to evaluate costs, where individual distribution facility owners (DFOs) have the discretion to construct broad or detailed cost categories as the see fit. DFOs are to streamline the categorization of routine costs and provide a higher degree of detail on complex issues as they assign categories.[1]
To view more of this post, please
Login Here
Capital Power’s Strathmore Project Underbuild Cost Argument
In Proceeding 26510, Capital Power Corporation (Capital Power) argues before the Alberta Utilities Commission (the Commission) why FortisAlberta Inc.’s (Fortis) additional charges to Capital Power associated to the interconnection of the Strathmore Solar Project (the Strathmore Project) are unjustified.
To view more of this post, please
Login Here
EQUS and Fortis’s Arguments For and Against Consumer Transfer Exit Charges
In Proceeding 26668, EQUS REA Ltd. (EQUS) and FortisAlberta Ltd. (Fortis) argue before the Alberta Utilities Commission (the Commission) whether exit charges imposed by Fortis on two consumers who want to make EQUS their service provider are justified.
To view more of this post, please
Login Here
AESO Bulk and Regional Rate Design and Modernized DOS Rate Design Application
In proceeding 26911, the Alberta Electric System Operator requests that the Alberta Utilities Commission (the Commission) approve its application for it’s proposed bulk and regional rate design, treatment of energy storage, and modernization of Demand Opportunity Service (DOS).
To view more of this post, please
Login Here
The Commission’s Ruling on Applications to Review the DCG Credit Decision
In Proceeding 26660, the Commission review panel issues a decision regarding Kalina Distributed Power Limited, Campus Energy Partners LP, Lionstooth Energy Inc., and Signalta Resources Limited (collectively, KLSC), and BluEarth Renewables Inc. and Elemental Energy Renewables Inc. (collectively, BE)’s applications for a review of Decision 26090-D01-2021.
To view more of this post, please
Login Here
Evidence Submissions in AltaLink’s 2022-2023 GTA
Proceeding 26509 follows AltaLink Management Ltd. (AltaLink) in its application for the approval of a 2022-2023 General Tariff Application (GTA) for each of Altalink, L.P. (ALP), PiikaniLink, L.P. (PLP), and KainaiLink, L.P. (KLP), as well as a Deferral Accounts Reconciliation Application for ALP. Evidentiary submissions and argument summaries have now been submitted in this proceeding.
To view more of this post, please