TransAlta 2022-2023 GTA Arguments

In proceeding 27964, TransAlta Corporation (TransAlta) and the Utilities Consumer Advocate (UCA) submit their arguments before the Alberta Utilities Commission (the Commission) in support and opposition to certain parts of TransAlta’s 2022-2023 general tariff application. TransAlta requested a $9.0 million revenue requirement for 2022 and $9.4 million for 2023, along with a one-time payment from the Alberta Electric System Operator (AESO) of $846,000 to reconcile approved interim rates. The three main issues on which the arguments focus are non-union salary escalation rates, TransAlta’s operations and maintenance (O&M) agreement with AltaLink Management Ltd. (AltaLink), and TransAlta’s First Nations Advisory Committee costs.



To view more of this post, please

Login Here

or contact us.

EPCOR’s 2023 System Access Services Rates Update Application

In proceeding 28133, EPCOR Distribution & Transmission Inc. (EPCOR) submits its 2023 System Access Service (SAS) rates application to the Alberta Utilities Commission (the Commission) in response to the 2023 independent system operator (ISO) tariff of the Alberta Electric System Operator (AESO). EPCOR states it is only updating its SAS rates to reflect the 2023 AESO demand transmission service (DTS) charges and that all other inputs are those originally approved in Decision 27653-D01-2022.[1]



To view more of this post, please

Login Here

or contact us.

EPCOR’s 2023-2025 General Tariff Application Decision

In proceeding 27675, the Alberta Utilities Commission (the Commission) issues its decision regarding the 2023-2025 general tariff application (GTA) of EPCOR Transmission & Distribution Inc. (EPCOR). Rather than proceed through an argument process, EPCOR negotiated a settlement with the Consumer’s Coalition of Alberta (CCA) and the Utilities Consumer Advocate (UCA). After review, the Commission approves EPCOR’s 2023-2025 GTA, which includes the negotiated settlement reduction of $10.81 million, the withdrawal of EPCOR’s request for a cloud-based software as a service (SaaS) cost deferral account, and compliance with Commission decisions.



To view more of this post, please

Login Here

or contact us.

2022 ISO Tariff Modernization Application Arguments

In Proceeding 27864, the Alberta Electric System Operator (AESO) and interveners submit their arguments before the Commission for and against the AESO’s 2022 Independent System Operator (ISO) Tariff Modernization Application. In general, intervenors oppose the AESO’s proposed revisions to System Access Service Requests (SASRs) and Generating Unit Owner’s Contribution (GUOC) policies. However, intervenors do not oppose the AESO’s revisions to Transmission Must Run (TMR), cost allocation for transmission line relocations, or Payment in Lieu of Notice (PILON), which we summarize in our previous article. Therefore, this article only discusses the SASR and GUOC arguments.



To view more of this post, please

Login Here

or contact us.

Distribution Exemption Application

ATCO Electric and Sustaintech have submitted Evidence and IRs in the proceeding on Sustaintech’s application for distribution exemption (ID 27633).

Readers will recall from a previous update that Sustainitech and ARC enterprises (together, SACO) are applying for a distribution exemption under the Hydro and Electric Energy Act (HEEA) which would allow a gas processing plant to supply energy to an adjacent site without qualifying as a distribution system.

ATCO electric intervened in the proceeding raising concerns about the application’s compatibility with the Electric Utilities Act (EUA), specifically the requirement that persons using electricity obtain that service from the distribution company in whose service area they are located (Sec, 101).  ATCO subsequently submitted intervener evidence and responded to information requests.



To view more of this post, please

Login Here

or contact us.

Directions for Fortis’s Streetlight Investment

In Proceeding 27682, the Alberta Utilities Commission (the Commission) issues its decision regarding the terms and conditions (T&Cs) of FortisAlberta Inc. (Fortis) that pertain to its streetlight investment. In December 2021, Fortis sought the Commission’s input to determine whether Fortis should pay its streetlight investment to the developer or the municipality if the parties cannot agree on who is entitled to the payment. In Decision 27067-D01-2022, the Commission directed that the streetlight investment be paid to the municipality if the developer and municipality are in dispute. The Commission further directed Fortis to clarify the streetlight investment entitlement in its T&Cs.[1]

Fortis made its compliance filing. However, the Commission found that Fortis only complied with one of the three directions. Nevertheless, the Commission does not require Fortis to submit another compliance filing because the Commission will hear issues concerning streetlight investment in Proceeding 27658.[2]



To view more of this post, please

Login Here

or contact us.

Arguments on ATCO’s Disposal of its 2018-2021 Transmission Deferral Accounts

In Proceeding 26573, ATCO Electric Ltd. (ATCO) proposed to remove $10.8 million of what it deemed as “above fair market value” costs related to matting, brushing, and hydrovac services for the Jasper Interconnection Project (Jasper Project). The proposed adjustment would reduce the project cost from $35.9 million to approximately $25.1 million. However, the original cost estimate for the project was $9.2 million.[1]

The Alberta Utilities Commission (the Commission) reopened this deferral account application after completing an investigative process that revealed ATCO sole-sourced its matting, brushing, and hydrovac contract to Backwoods Contracting Ltd. (Backwoods) at above-market rates. The $10.8 million is what ATCO estimates are the above-market amount spent on the project. In this proceeding, the CCA and the UCA present their arguments before the Commission on whether ATCO’s proposed $10.8 million reduction is reasonable. 



To view more of this post, please

Login Here

or contact us.

ATCO Electric Transmission 2023-2025 Tariff Application Arguments

In Proceeding 27062, ATCO Electric Transmission (ATCO) submit its 2023-2025 general tariff application to the Alberta Utilities Commission (the Commission) for approval. In December 2022, all parties agreed to a negotiated settlement, which the Commission approved in January 2023. However, the settlement excluded the three following matters:

  • A depreciation adjustment related to the Jasper Palisades Isolated Generation Plant.
  • Modification to the variable pay program.
  • Vegetation management reserve removal.

The intervening parties submit their oral arguments that address these three remaining issues.



To view more of this post, please

Login Here

or contact us.

FortisAlberta EV Charging Pilot Project

On January 16, FortisAlberta launched an Electric Vehicle Charging pilot project.  Fortis is looking to sign up to 600 vehicles throughout its service territory. Initially the project will simply gather data on how and when EV owners charge their vehicles. Latter stages will include managed charging.

FortisAlberta included costs associated with this, and other demand side management pilot projects, in their 2023 Cost Rebasing Application. In Decision 26615-D01-2022, the Commission approved the pilot project, but asked for additional information, included specific goals and measurable key performance indicators.



To view more of this post, please

Login Here

or contact us.

Residential Standards of Service and Maximum Investment Levels (MILs) Proceeding Issues List

In Proceeding 27658, the Alberta Utilities Commission (the Commission) finalizes the issues list for addressing standards of service and maximum investment levels for residential services. In September, the Commission put forward a preliminary list of issues for consideration. The Commission received comments on the preliminary issues from ATCO Electric Ltd. (ATCO), EPCOR Distribution & Transmission Inc., ENMAX Power Corporation, FortisAlberta Inc., the Alberta Federation of Rural Electrification Associations, the Office of the Utilities Consumer Advocate, and Melcor Developments Ltd. The Commission developed the following list based on these submissions.[1]

Issues List Summary[2]

  • The goal of setting MILs.
  • Whether MILs should be eliminated.
  • If MILs are not eliminated, determining the types of costs that should be eligible for MILs.
  • Deciding whether the prior MILs principles referenced in Decision 2010-309 are relevant and result in reasonable rates.
  • The scope of work that developers expect completed in exchange for MILs.
  • The electrical infrastructure the developer or homeowner is responsible for installing.
  • The average cost of providing electrical service to new greenfield residential developments.
  • The proportion of new connection costs to be recovered through MILs.
  • The developer and distribution facility owner (DFO) costs for consideration in MILs.
  • The timing of a utility investing in new residential services (i.e., once the infrastructure is in place, or when an end-use customer has bought a home and has enrolled with a utility service?).
  • The effect of performance-based regulation (PBR) on MILs.
  • Whether the developer or the municipality is responsible for street lighting.


To view more of this post, please

Login Here

or contact us.